Arutz-7

STOCKHOLM REVISITED
By YEDIDYA ATLAS

The following article is in response to the many letters we 
received regarding Yasser Arafat's secret meeting with top Arab 
diplomats in Stockholm's Grand Hotel on January 30, 1996. 
Despite the story's independent verification by a number of top 
investigative journalists and terrorism experts in several 
countries, there is a campaign afoot to deny it's accuracy which 
appears to be emanating from the Prime Minister's Office in 
Jerusalem and the Israeli Embassy in Washington.  

The ensuing article, entitled: "Arafat's Secret Agenda Is to 
Wear Israelis Out" appeared in the April 1, 1996 issue of 
Insight magazine in Washington D.C. written by this 
correspondent. Additional comments follow the article:

"In the dark shadow of horrific suicide bombings in Israel 
carried out by Hamas terrorists operating from the safe haven of 
Mr. Arafat's Palestinian Authority (PA), an Israeli government 
which had asserted that the leopard of the Palestine Liberation 
Organization had changed its spots, finds itself questioning its 
basic premise: Does Yasser Arafat really believe in the peace 
process with Israel, and what are his true intentions?

According to reports of an unpublicized January meeting between 
Mr. Arafat and Swedish-based Arab diplomats in Stockholm, Arafat 
estimates that the final-stage agreements between the 
Palestinians and Israel will ultimately bring about Israel's 
collapse. He reportedly told the diplomats that a migration of 
Arabs to 'the West Bank and Jerusalem' and the psychological 
warfare the Palestinians would wage against the Israelis would 
cause a massive emigration of Jews to the United States. 'We 
Palestinians will takeover everything, including all of 
Jerusalem,' the PLO leader declared, claiming Israeli leaders 
'Peres and Beilin have already promised us half of Jerusalem. 
The Golan Heights have already been given away, subject to just 
a few details.'

'We of the PLO will now concentrate all our efforts on 
splitting Israel psychologically into two camps,' Arafat 
reportedly declared. 'Within five years, we will have six to 
seven million Arabs living on the West Bank and in Jerusalem. 
All Palestinian Arabs will be welcomed by us. If the Jews can 
import all kinds of Ethiopians, Russians, Uzbeks and Ukranians 
as Jews, we can import all kinds of Arabs to us.' He added that 
the PLO plans 'to eliminate the State of Israel and establish a 
purely Palestinian State. We will make life unbearable for Jews 
by psychological warfare and population explosion; Jews won't 
want to live among us Arabs.'

Mr. Arafat's meeting took place on January 30th, in Stockholm's 
Grand Hotel shortly after an official state dinner in his honor 
sponsored by Sweden's Foreign Minister. Unlike the 'Jihad' 
speech given by Mr. Arafat in a Johannesburg mosque two years 
ago, no recording exists. However, an investigation by Israel's 
Channel 7 (Arutz Sheva) Radio news (which also released the 
Johannesburg tape) has confirmed the existence and authenticity 
of a transcript, as have Swedish sources and Murray Kahl, editor 
of Israeli & Global News. Channel 7 broadcast excerpts on Feb. 
14.

The next day, the Israeli Hebrew language dailies Ha'aretz and 
Ma'ariv both ran the story quoting Channel 7 Radio, and Ma'ariv 
translated the radio report to Arabic and passed it on to 
Arafat's office in Gaza requesting comment. Arafat told Ma'ariv 
that the story was 'not true and not accurate.' He then admitted 
that the secret meeting had, in fact, occurred but claimed the 
Arab ambassadors came on their own initiative to congratulate 
him on his boldness in pursuing peace with Israel and his 
victory in the Palestinian elections. [Mr. Arafat failed to 
explain, why, if the meeting's content was as he alleged, it was 
kept such a secret until Arutz 7's broadcast exposed its having 
took place. YA]

Two days later, the conservative Norwegian newspaper Dagen 
published new details regarding Arafat's speech under a 
front-page headline declaring: 'Arafat Gave Speech about 
Israel's Destruction.' The Jerusalem Post ran the story Feb. 23, 
and on Feb. 24, the Swedish weekly Magazinet published excerpts 
from the speech. Meanwhile, three prominent Israeli writers, 
Chaim Guri, Aharon Amir and Aharon Meged took note of the 
Channel 7 and Dagen's reportage and published articles in 
leading Israeli newspapers expressing deep concern [over 
Arafat's true intentions and the Peres government's inability to 
recognize them. YA]. 

The Israeli press since has revealed that the investigative 
division of the Israel Defense Forces, or IDF, circulated among 
its intelligence personnel a copy of the article on Arafat's 
speech in Stockholm. Observers thought this had particular 
import after IDF Military Intelligence chief, Major General 
Moshe Ya'alon, told a Committee of Israel's parliament, the 
Knesset, in mid-January that Arafat has no intention of 
dismantling the Hamas terrorist infrastructure, stating that 
both Hamas and Islamic Jihad continue to freely arm themselves 
with weapons and explosives and recruit new activists. Ya'alon 
testified again in February that Arafat has still failed to take 
any significant steps against Hamas.

The day after the second Jerusalem bus bombing and the morning 
of the Tel Aviv explosion, the new head of Israel's General 
Security Service, Ami Ayalon, appeared before the Knesset's 
Foreign Affairs & Defense Committee and reported that suicide 
bombers are recruited by faculty members of the (Islamic) 
Teachers Seminary in Ramallah, after which they undergo 
technical training in the Islamic Colleges, and 'spiritual' 
preparation by the Muslim imams from the mosques. Ramallah is 
under the jurisdiction of Arafat and his PA. Had the PLO leader 
been interested in dismantling the Hamas terrorist 
infrastructure, he would never have had to travel far.

Early in March, under tremendous pressure, Arafat finally began 
to crack down on Hamas - just as polls showed that Likud had 
overtaken Labor peace forces and that the Israeli elections 
might produce a government more likely to resist Arafat's 
long-term plans. He is nothing if not pragmatic, and he can 
wait."

The above article was written in mid-March. During and since 
that time, others have published confirmations. For the sake of 
brevity, I shall quote only two wholly respectable and 
establishment accepted sources: 

The first, BIPAC (British-Israel Public Affairs Committee, the 
British version of "AIPAC" in the U.S.). In its quarterly 
publication, "BIPAC Briefing" of March  1996, BIPAC reported: 
"Arafat's remarks......were reported by the Norwegian daily 
Dagen and confirmed to BIPAC Briefing by senior Arab sources in 
London."

The second: Ehud Ya'ari, Israel Television's 
(government-sponsored Channel One) premier Arab Affairs reporter 
and commentator, wrote the following in his column in the April 
4, 1996, issue of The Jerusalem Report: "The government of 
Israel already has, for example, full confirmation of the 
accuracy of the words Arafat has been quoted as saying in his 
meeting with Arab diplomats in Stockholm. He spoke there, as 
reported [by Arutz 7 Radio], about the 'psychological pressure' 
and 'demographic pressure' that will cause Israel to crumble in 
the end, and its Jews to run for cover. For reasons of momentary 
convenience, the [Peres] government chose not to challenge 
Arafat on his vision of the New Middle East. In the Israeli 
press, the item was pushed to the bottom of the inside pages."

Ya'ari clearly indicates that the Peres government, although 
fully cognizant of Arafat's Stockholm speech, has deliberately 
ignored both its existence and political ramifications. It 
appears to this reporter that given the official public 
statements issued by the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem as 
well as by the highest Israeli officials in the Embassy in 
Washington, there is a concerted effort by the Peres government 
to not only ignore the story, but to actively spread 
disinformation abroad and deny its validity.

A recent story in The Washington Jewish Week is a classic 
example of Jewish yellow journalism. The headline and its 
contents try to systematically deny the accuracy of the Arutz 7 
Radio reports and that of the Norwegian daily newspaper Dagen. 
The Jewish Week's reporter, if he can be called that, managed to 
write a whole story about Arutz 7 without having the 
professional courtesy of even talking to Arutz 7. Nor is it 
clear that he spoke with the reporter from the Dagen. 

He sets great store in  quoting "Arutz 7's key source," a Mr. 
Berlinger in Stockholm, as denying he confirmed the story for 
Arutz 7. Apparently it is The Jewish Week's policy that its 
reporters are not only not required to speak to those who wrote 
and reported the stories which The Jewish Week wishes to 
discredit, they are not even required to read the target stories 
either.

Had The Jewish Week's "reporter" read Arutz 7's reports, he 
would have known that Mr. Berlinger was not mentioned anywhere 
in the story, he was not a key source, or even any source. The 
only Swedish source mentioned by name who confirmed the 
existence of the hitherto secret meeting was Ms. Annika Soder, 
director of the Press Division of Sweden's Foreign Ministry who 
told Arutz-7: "...The [Arab] ambassadors, as we call  them, were 
not in the official program, but I heard that he [Arafat] met 
them in the hotel after dinner."

Moreover, although The Jewish Week quotes the Tel Aviv based 
Institute for Peace Education as confirming The Jewish Week's 
contention that the Arutz 7 report was false, here too its 
reporter neglected to speak with Yigal Carmon, former advisor on 
terrorism to the Prime Minister of Israel, and head of the 
Institute. And when he spoke with him after the publication of 
the malicious and slanderous article, Mr. Carmon told him that 
on the contrary, he believes the story true and faxed The Jewish 
Week a letter stating just that wherein he made reference to 
Ehud Ya'ari's column previously mentioned.

At this point, Arutz 7 is waiting for The Washington Jewish Week 
to publish a prominent apology for its shoddy and malevolent 
story, and wonders why The Jewish Week's editors felt the need 
to attempt to deny the story more than a month after it was 
initially released. One Washington observer opined to this 
reporter that the impetus for The Jewish Week's "hatchet job 
probably emanated  from the Israeli Embassy in view of the 
appearance of the Insight magazine article on Capitol Hill the 
previous week." One hopes The Washington Jewish Week is only 
guilty of poor editorial control, and not political bias to the 
extreme. 

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *

Yedidya Atlas is Arutz-7's senior correspondent for events in
Washington D.C. and the U.S. in general. His articles have 
appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Insight Magazine, The 
Jerusalem Post and other publications. Mr. Atlas resides in 
Israel, but travels frequently to the U.S. on behalf of Arutz-7.